Study demonstrates that false conclusions are reached when MIQE is not followed

August 2, 2012 at 3:37 pm Leave a comment

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. published a case study that shows how real-time PCR (qPCR) can lead to erroneous conclusions if the key steps set out in the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines are not followed. The study examined the effects of RNA sample quality and reference gene stability — two critical components of the MIQE checklist — on gene expression, comparing differences between normal and tumor breast cancer samples.

“These data demonstrate the importance of the MIQE methodology on the final conclusions drawn from qPCR experiments,” said Sean Taylor, lead author of the case study and a Bio-Rad senior field application specialist. “The guidelines were designed to offer a standardized, methodical approach to this highly sensitive technique to ensure that all data published with qPCR are consistent, reproducible, and — most important — a true reflection of the conclusions.”

As a result of its high sensitivity, qPCR has become the gold standard for validating DNA microarray data and is routinely used to determine gene expression differences in a wide variety of samples. However, inadequate sample processing and handling, poor primer design and validation, and inappropriate reference gene selection may result in data being misinterpreted. The MIQE guidelines were published to assist the scientific community to produce consistent, high-quality data from qPCR experiments.

The case study (Bio-Rad Tech Note 6245) used the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) protein MCM7 as a model target gene to investigate the importance of appropriate reference gene selection and RNA sample quality from breast cancer samples as described by MIQE. Following the MIQE guidelines, a significant increase in gene expression of MCM7 was observed between normal and tumor samples when using high-quality and -purity RNA with normalization using stable reference genes. However, inconclusive and even opposite results were obtained when using poor-quality RNA samples and unstable reference genes. These results demonstrate that inappropriate conclusions may be drawn from qPCR data if key steps from the MIQE guidelines are ignored.

Bio-Rad is dedicated to promoting the integrity of qPCR research and offers an array of technology and resources that will help researchers become MIQE compliant. To learn more, read the case study at http://bit.ly/MIQE_case, a published version of the case study in Molecular Biotechnology at http://bit.ly/qPCRPitfalls, or watch the video at http://bit.ly/MIQE_Video.

Entry filed under: Bio-Rad Tech Note, PCR Technotes. Tags: , , .

Blame it on the DNA The science of relaxation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


biorad1

Bio-Rad Canada has sponsored the development of this site to advance the productivity of the Canadian Biotechnology sector and the fine people who work in it across the country.  We invite readers to contribute content: posters, tools, research and presentations, articles white papers, multimedia, music downloads and entertainment, conference announcements, videos. Please contact info@cbt20.ca for more information.

Bookmark and Share

Site developed by What If What Next(TM)

Follow us on Twitter


%d bloggers like this: